Side-by-Side Comparison
Select up to 4 vehicles to compare
Specs
| On-road price | $41,020 |
| 10yr net TCO | $65,120 |
| Fuel / energy | 14.7 kWh/100km |
| Range | ~510 km |
| Ground clearance | 140 mm |
| Towing | 0 lbs |
| Cargo (3rd up) | 561 L |
| 3rd row | none |
| Seats | 5 seats |
| Powertrain | BEV (RWD/AWD) |
Criterion Scores
| 10yr TCO | |
| Car Seat Fit | |
| Cargo Utility | |
| 3rd Row Comfort | |
| Corridor Perf. | |
| Hitch | |
| Reliability | |
| Winter | |
| FSR |
10yr Cost Breakdown
| Purchase | $41,020 |
| + Fuel / Energy | $2,900 |
| + Maintenance | $11,000 |
| + Insurance | $21,700 |
| − Residual | −$11,500 |
| Net TCO | $65,120 |
Why it ranks here
The efficiency leader of the used BEVs — lowest kWh/100km means the lowest running cost in the cohort, plus a frunk and a trunk that swallow more than the sedan shape suggests. Excellent for the mostly-city duty cycle.
Trade-offs
Sedan cargo and low clearance limit it for gear-hauling and snow. RWD variants want winter tires for Kamloops.